Six tools that turn a stack of medical records into something a lawyer can use, sorted by the job each one is built for. Two of them now bundle human staff. Two publish a price list. One is built for medical malpractice rather than personal injury in general. This page says which is which, and it is honest about the cases where you should stay where you are.
If you run a high-volume personal-injury practice and the demand package is what you send adjusters, EvenUp is built for you, and since May 2026 it will also staff your pre-litigation file with case managers. If you run mass-tort or high-volume PI and want a vendor whose own subject-matter experts check every chronology, that is Supio. If your firm already lives in Filevine, use its chronology and stop reading. If you are a solo or small firm that wants a published price and a page count you can budget against, Chartely and ProvaLens both print their numbers.
If the case is medical malpractice, the question is different: not "how fast can I get a demand out" but "can I prove a deviation from the standard of care, page by page, and will a physician sign it." That is what MedLegal AI is built for, and it is the only tool on this page that sells a physician's written review alongside the software.
EvenUp sells to plaintiff PI firms. Its product is the demand package: records in, a settlement demand out. In May 2026 it added what it calls Pre-Litigation-as-a-Service, in which its software plus US-based case managers run the pre-lit file for the firm. Pricing is not public and is case-based; third-party reports put it at roughly $500 to $2,000 a month or about $300 per demand, on a three-month minimum, with a 30-day money-back period and no free trial. Those are reports, not a price list, so get the quote in writing.
Supio sells to plaintiff PI and mass-tort firms and describes its footprint as 27,000 cases and more than $1 billion in settlements (its own figure). Two things set it apart: its subject-matter experts verify every chronology before it reaches the firm, and it integrates with Westlaw for research. Pricing is not public; third-party estimates run $150 to $400 per user per month, and they conflict with each other.
Filevine's medical chronology is a feature of Filevine, not a standalone product. If your matters, documents and tasks already live there, a chronology that appears inside the file is the path of least resistance. Standalone pricing is not public; the reported structure is a per-user base plus paid AI modules and an implementation fee, which only makes sense if you are adopting or already on the platform.
Chartely aims at solo and small firms and publishes its pricing: a free tier of 50 pages a month with no card, a $49 Pro tier for 1,000 pages, a $199 Scale tier for 7,500 pages, and overage of $0.04 to $0.06 per page. It also offers an API. The pitch is speed: minutes rather than days.
ProvaLens sells to small PI firms and publishes its pricing: Solo at $249 a month for five matters, Firm at $999. Its distinctive feature is expert vetting, including a cross-check of an expert's prior testimony against the record and contradiction detection.
MedLegal AI is built for medical-malpractice work on either side of the caption. Every fact in a chronology, standard-of-care analysis or damages workup is cited to the file, page and Bates number it came from, so the expert or the adjuster can click through to the source. Ask the Record answers questions about a record with no model in the loop: labs and vitals by name, studies by type, visits by provider, any exact phrase, each with its page cite. And when the question is whether the case has merit, a board-certified physician can review the record and sign a written report for a fixed fee. Pricing is public: $19 per case, $49 a month for Pro, $249 for Professional, $499 for Firm, and $1,400 per civil case or $1,000 per workers' compensation case for the physician review.
Only facts we could source from the vendors' own pages or from named third-party reports appear here. Where a vendor does not publish a price, the cell says so.
| Tool | Built for | Pricing | Humans in the loop | What it does that the others do not |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EvenUp | Plaintiff personal injury | Not public. Case-based; reported $500–$2,000/mo or ~$300 per demand; 3-month minimum; 30-day money-back; no free trial | Yes: US case managers run pre-litigation (May 2026) | Demand packages plus a staffed pre-lit service |
| Supio | Plaintiff PI and mass tort | Not public. Third-party estimates $150–$400/user/mo | Yes: subject-matter experts verify every chronology | Westlaw integration |
| Filevine | Firms already on Filevine | Not public as a standalone; bundled into the platform with AI modules and an implementation fee | No | Chronology lives inside the case file |
| Chartely | Solo and small firms | Public. Free 50 pp/mo; Pro $49 for 1,000 pp; Scale $199 for 7,500 pp; $0.04–$0.06/pp overage | No | No-card free tier; API |
| ProvaLens | Small PI firms | Public. Solo $249/mo (5 matters); Firm $999 | No | Checks the expert's prior testimony against the record |
| MedLegal AI | Medical malpractice, plaintiff and defense | Public. $19/case; Pro $49/mo; Professional $249/mo; Firm $499/mo; physician review $1,400 civil / $1,000 workers' comp | Yes, when you ask: a board-certified physician reads and signs | Page-cited to Bates; Ask the Record with no model in the loop; physician merit review; free Expert Stress Test |
A feature-by-feature matrix covering these vendors plus Harvey and CoCounsel is in our 13-feature comparison; this page is the plain-language version.
We would rather you pick the right tool than pick us and churn. These are the situations where another vendor is the better answer.
Firms rarely rip out EvenUp or Supio on day one. The common pattern is to run the next med-mal file through MedLegal AI while the PI tool keeps doing PI: upload the records, get the page-cited chronology and the standard-of-care analysis, hand both to the expert, and, if the merit question is open, order the physician review. If the tool earns its place on that file, it earns the next one.
Start the 14-day free trial →EvenUp sells demand packages to plaintiff personal-injury firms and, since May 2026, a pre-litigation service in which its software and US-based case managers run the pre-lit file. Supio sells to plaintiff PI and mass-tort firms; its chronologies are verified by human subject-matter experts and it integrates with Westlaw. Neither publishes a price list.
Neither price is public. Third-party reports put EvenUp at roughly $500 to $2,000 a month or about $300 per demand, on a three-month minimum with a 30-day money-back period and no free trial. Third-party estimates for Supio run $150 to $400 per user per month. Treat both as estimates and get a written quote.
Chartely publishes a free tier of 50 pages a month, a $49 Pro tier for 1,000 pages, a $199 Scale tier for 7,500 pages, and overage of $0.04 to $0.06 per page. ProvaLens publishes a $249 a month Solo plan covering five matters and a $999 Firm plan. MedLegal AI publishes $19 per case, $49 a month for Pro, $249 for Professional and $499 for Firm, plus a fixed-fee physician records review at $1,400 per civil case and $1,000 per workers' compensation case.
Keep EvenUp if your practice is high-volume personal injury and the demand package is the product you sell to adjusters, or if you want case managers to run pre-litigation for you. Keep Supio if you run mass-tort or high-volume PI and want a vendor whose staff signs off on every chronology and whose research lives in Westlaw. Keep Filevine's chronology if your firm already runs on Filevine.
It is built for medical malpractice rather than general personal injury. Every fact in a chronology or analysis is cited to the file, page and Bates number it came from. Ask the Record answers questions about a record without any model in the loop: if a value is in the table, it is on the page. A board-certified physician can review the record and sign a written report for a fixed fee. None of the other tools on this page sells a physician's signature.
Fourteen days, no credit card, three case analyses included. If the PI tool you already pay for is doing its job, keep it; bring us the malpractice case.
Start free trial →
Last updated September 25, 2026. Vendor descriptions come from each vendor's own website on that date; EvenUp, Supio and Filevine do not publish prices, and the figures shown for them are third-party reports that conflict with one another. Chartely and ProvaLens prices are from their public pricing pages. MedLegal AI prices are from our pricing page. Vendor accuracy and volume claims are self-reported. Nothing here is legal advice.
Related: MedLegal AI vs EvenUp · MedLegal AI vs Filevine · EvenUp vs Supio · All comparisons